Until you die, you can always try again.
Until you die, you can always try again.
This is the greatest and best podcast in the world.
Maybe waking up isn’t that hard, at least compared to going to jail.
Your circumstances don’t stop you from being a magnificent, shining swan.
Your purpose is the atom of your beliefs.
You can be happy as a jerk.
If you’re going to slice open an innocent fruit and scoop out its insides, you might as well make it delicious.
Not every season is Christmas sweater season, but here’s a new season of the podcast.
Various tasteful games are played in life. Some of them range from Drummer Or Serial Killer? to Professor Or Serial Killer?
I’d like to introduce a new variation: Medication Or Elf From The Lord Of The Rings?
(obligatory drum roll)
…a medication. It’s a form of long-acting insulin.
(next obligatory drum roll)
…also a medication. It’s an anti-HIV agent whose mechanism is HIV-1 protease inhibition.
I wrote this piece for a competition entitled ‘The psychiatrist’s role in responding to global disasters’. It was run by a society of psychiatrists. I don’t think they liked it much.
Psychiatrists have no role in global disasters.
“Wait, wait!” you cry in outrage.
Hear me out.
Many eons ago, dinosaurs decided to drop dead, and the way was paved for Homo sapiens to take over the earth. And that was exactly what humankind did. They put animals in zoos, traded financial instruments, made television shows, flew to other countries, and generally enjoyed their man-made creations – like sausage rolls and drive-in cinemas.
But with that luxury came an inevitable risk: the danger of losing everything. Because of the advent of civilisation, things which didn’t matter before started to become vitally important. The fragile entity of the economy, social fears, world politics, technological dependence – all of these became concepts that can be threatened by global disasters (World Economic Forum 2020).
Wealth can be protective against adverse outcomes, yes, but the strong risk of adverse outcome is still there (Brookings 2017; Scientific American 2017; The Guardian 2020). A severe enough disaster can affect basically everyone (United Nations 2020).
Thus, when a global disaster strikes, what the world needs isn’t psychiatrists; it’s resolution, co-operation, and community.
In emergencies, we can’t limit ourselves to a single role to achieve the most reparation. We need to be flexible and versatile. We need to revert to generalists to do the most good. We need to be ready to do whatever our training allows us to contribute, even if that doesn’t refer to the specialised skills trained many years for. We need to prepare for a step in humility, and we need to offer whatever basics the world most requires of us.
If the majority of the world is dying of an infectious disease, maybe you don’t need a psychiatrist right that second. But you do need a doctor generally when physical health is the most pressing issue.
Or maybe it’s something that can’t simply be cured that instant. Then perhaps you need a human, or a friend to help talk to you or bring you a hot meal, if emotional support is the thing required at the time (Purdue University 2018).
Neither of these situations calls singularly for a psychiatrist as the only prescription. They require a doctor – or simply a very helpful human.
That’s why psychiatrists specifically don’t have a role in global disasters. But doctors generally do. And especially in those times, doctors are human and need to be human first (PR Newswire 2011).
Disasters are bad. Pretty bad. By definition, it’s in the name. And if something bad turns global, it’s sure to be even worse.
There are the pandemics – Black Death, Spanish flu, HIV/AIDS, and now COVID-19 (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2017). There are the natural disasters – of which there are around 400 annually (Brookings 2010), with the potential to leave people trapped in gruelling conditions for days (Direct Relief 2019). There are the human-created dilemmas – terrorism, war, and others.
Each of these seems different on the surface, but they all have some grave things in common: significant death and injury, world chaos, a huge burden on healthcare workers, and depletion of the workforce.
Negative consequences range from economic devaluation to social anxiety to illness and injury to death, for which the stories can be jarring. During the COVID-19 pandemic, one woman described her experience of tragic loss. She woke up to find that her fiancé, who tested positive for COVID-19, was not next to her. Logically, she fathomed he must have been downstairs. However, something was unsettling; they had a parrot that typically squawked in conversation whenever someone was near it. But the parrot that day was completely silent. That was how she realised that her fiancé was dead at home downstairs (CBS News 2020).
We haven’t yet figured out how to revive people from the dead – and there are many reasons why we probably wouldn’t want to – so what we need is prevention over cure. Simply put, people need more healthcare in these moments to prevent deterioration. However, a significant proportion of people can’t afford to pay for healthcare even in normal times (The New York Times 2020).
Yet, it would be naïve to think that a global disaster doesn’t involve a massive shake-up to every industry – and health is no exception.
Especially, especially, if the global disaster is of such proportions that it disrupts the healthcare workforce. Speaking historically, with pandemics such as influenza or COVID-19, that’s a huge concern and probably even an inevitability (National Center for Biotechnology Information 2007).
When the world is short on medical staff, there’s a clear solution: source more.
Remember that psychiatrists aren’t just psychiatrists; they’re doctors.
There are certain times, such as global disasters, where it’s very important to be a doctor first and a specialist second. It’s only in this way that we can do what world healthcare needs holistically. It’s not about resorting to what we trained most recently in because that’s what we feel comfortable doing, as we can offer more by stepping out of that comfort zone – while remaining within the realm of our certified qualifications, of course. It’s not about choosing what we can charge the most for; the focus is what the patient needs the most.
Now, psychiatrists are important – it’s not much fun if your brain is running through depression or your mind is addled by psychosis – but we have to step back and remember what it’s all for. You train as a psychiatrist because you enjoy being a doctor and you have a specific interest in addressing pathologies of the mind. You take up that specialty because it’s the area you feel you have a knack for and can do the most good in.
But why do you become a doctor? Because you want to help people. Because you find health fascinating. Because you realise that a life lived with serious ailments and maladies is not really a life well lived at all – or at least one with a handicap better resolved as much as it can be.
So you become a psychiatrist because you want to be a mind doctor, and you became a doctor because you want to help people. You want to help people because you want to do some real good for the world, because you want to contribute to that idea of the greater good.
So really, if you can help the world a bit, that’s your mission accomplished. It isn’t about being a psychiatrist; it’s about doing good for others. Psychiatry is just the vessel you use to achieve that.
Which means, if some unprecedented situation arises like a huge pandemic or a massive tidal wave that demolishes half the city, you’re best to revert to your basic aims: helping people and doing the most good. If people around you are starving or succumbing to infection, maybe your priority doesn’t change – doing that good – but maybe your method does.
Emergency department doctors act as miniature specialists across many fields. If the patient enters with chest pain, they switch on cardiology mode. If it’s abdominal pain, they warp to gastroenterology thinking. In times of crisis, this is a model we need to emulate. It reflects the ability to be versatile and adapt to whatever the patient most pressingly needs.
Global disasters ruin life as we know it, which calls for adept generalists. That’s particularly when we need more than psychiatrists specifically; we need doctors generally.
Aesop wrote of a conversation between the Oak and the Reeds.
The Oak, haughty about its ability to stand upright and rigid no matter what, criticised the Reeds for unfailingly swaying with the breeze. Unruffled, the Reeds declared their intention to continue bending pliantly with the wind. Later that day, a hurricane struck and ripped the Oak out of the ground (Library of Congress n.d.).
Versatility is rewarded; inflexibility is destroyed.
Psychiatrists have no role in global disasters. Doctors do.